Department of the Environment,
Transport and the Regions
Rethinking Construction


CHAPTER 4
Enabling Improvement

Technology as a Tool

  1. The Task Force does not consider that technology on its own can provide the answer to the need for greater efficiency and quality in construction. There have been celebrated examples of new technology being used to reinforce outdated and wasteful processes - and it does not work. The advice offered to construction by leading manufacturing industries is to approach change by first sorting out the culture, then defining and improving processes and finally applying technology as a tool to support these cultural and process improvements.
  2. Members of the Task Force have seen the effectiveness of this approach for themselves on European housing sites that are using innovative forms of building, together with a high degree of prefabrication, pre-assembly and standardisation. What surprised us was that, when asked for the source of efficiency savings on site, the constructors and developers tended not to attribute them to the technology of construction but to pre-planning with suppliers and component manufacturers to minimise the time actually spent on site.
  3. One area in which we know new technology to be a very useful tool is in the design of buildings and their components, and in the exchange of design information throughout the construction team. There are enormous benefits to be gained, in terms of eliminating waste and rework for example, from using modern CAD technology to prototype buildings and by rapidly exchanging information on design changes. Redesign should take place on computer, not on the construction site.

Better Regulation

  1. We accept that a framework of regulatory controls in construction and development is entirely necessary, and indeed can help to produce efficiency and quality. But, in our view the interpretation and application of regulations is inconsistent across the country, making it more difficult to implement a construction project speedily and efficiently. Significant costs and delays are often incurred in the design and planning of projects by the variability of enforcement of regulations, and by duplication of processes between agencies.
  2. We invite central and local Government to look carefully at ways of achieving better regulation.In particular, we feel that there is scope for regulatory regimes such as building control to be more output driven, so that constructors and their clients are able to deliver to performance standards rather than detailed prescriptions. We are also of the view that making the processes of the land use planning system more predictable would help improve the efficiency of construction, particularly housebuilding. We look to Lord Rogers' task force on urban regeneration to consider this issue.

Back Contents Forward


Published 16 July 1998